To read the paradoxical story of this big tree, click
here.
I continue to learn so much through this missionary training course. It's been valuable for reviewing and debriefing my two years in Kenya, considering how to engage with the cultures and languages in France and Burundi, and reflecting on handling life's events such as adversity, conflict, transitions, stress, differences, goodbyes.
A common statistic quoted in missionary circles is that the number one reason missionaries leave the mission field is conflict with other missionaries. I'm so thankful for my team and how God has knit us together and even grafted in
new members over the last year. By His grace, we lived/worked/socialized/ministered/worshipped together for two years in Kenya and miraculously still really enjoy being together. We've made big group decisions by collaborating until everyone was on the same page. I know conflict is inevitable, but we pray God will continue to enable us to be peacemakers for each other and for those around us.
In light of all that, though, two days of this missionary training were focused on conflict. I was unaware of this before, but it turns out that there are five conflict languages just like there are five love languages. Maturity in conflict involves flexibility in speaking another person's conflict language instead of just your own. We each identified our primary conflict language, joined small groups accordingly, and discussed the strengths and weaknesses of our conflict style and that of the other four. The next day, we intersected with each of the other groups and shared positive feedback as well as constructive criticism. Our assignment also included individual phone calls to a friend or teammate and a family member to discuss our conflict styles, how that affects others, and what we could improve on.
The whole exercise, while emotionally draining, was incredibly insightful. I had always just assumed I was terrible at conflict because I'm an avoider, but I learned there are strengths as well as weaknesses in that style. I also have hope for improvement in the weakness areas and in learning to speak other conflict languages. I look forward to discussing these unique evaluations with my teammates more when we are all together in France and trust the conversation will be valuable in continuing to establish team unity and love.
So, what's your conflict language?
1) Shark - Competing style. Goals are highly important, relationships less so. Conflicts settled by one person winning and another losing. Advantages - useful with quick decision/action is required, when important policies must be implemented, when being right is what matters most, when the issue is trivial and others don't care what happens. High assertiveness in conflict, low cooperativeness.
2) Fox - Compromising style. In seeking a compromise, they give up part of their goals and persuade the other person to do the same. Win a little, lose a little solution. Valuable when goals of both parties are moderately important but not worth fighting for, when a quick solution is required and both parties can give up something, when time pressures don't allow a search for a mutually satisfying solution. Medium assertiveness and cooperativeness.
3) Turtle - Avoiding style. Withdrawal to avoid conflicts. May result in slow death of relationships. Useful in postponing tension, when risk outweighs gain, when others can solve the problem more effectively, when the issues are small. Low assertiveness and cooperativeness in conflict.
4) Teddy bear - Accommodating style. Relationship is of great importance, their personal agenda less so. People pleasers. Smooth over conflict for fear of harming the relationship. Useful to preserve harmony, prevent competition, when issues are not important to the individual. Low assertiveness and high cooperativeness.
5) Owl - Collaborating style. High value of both their goals and their relationships. View conflicts as problems to be solved and seek a solution everyone will be happy with. Want all tensions and negative feelings to be fully resolved. Advantageous in mutual exploration of new approaches and mutual resolution of conflict. Results in win/win permanent solution. Can be time consuming and result in analysis paralysis. High assertiveness and high cooperativeness.